Students’ first amendment rights in the age of the Internet



Don't use plagiarized sources. Get Your Custom Essay on
Students’ first amendment rights in the age of the Internet
Just from $13/Page
Order Essay



Should a college suspend students who brag about breaking its rules on their social media platforms




Public universities and colleges have a law that gives students freedom of speech, especially political discourse. However, this law protects the institutions by punishing students who violate the institution’s social media policies. To protect their reputation, universities should guard their images on social media platforms by ensuring that their student’s post is ethical and does not demote their image to the outside world. Under what circumstances, there are always limits on expurgating students’ speech despite how they are limited. This essay opposes that universities and colleges should suspend students who brag about breaking its rules on social media platforms.  

 This essay will base its argument on the duty ethical framework. This framework focuses on duties and obligations considering the moral commitments present and the things we should not do (O’Fallon et al., 2013). Moreover, the duty ethical framework creates a system of rules that expect all people. Basing some precedents on various court rulings, they help school administrators navigate issues of social media posts while ensuring constitutional rights are upheld (Tabor, 2009). In a case where a cheerleader’s vulgar message prompts a first amendment showdown, the student expressed dissatisfaction with the couch in a Snapchat post. It circulated to an extend of reaching the coach who suspended the student. The student sued the school, and the court ruling was that the first amendment did not allow public schools to punish students for what they post on social media outside school grounds.

 The 8-1 decision states that institutes do not have the right to punish their students because of their speech unless it disrupts learning activities or violates other students’ rights. Bragging of violating school rules on social medial may lack substantive evidence if the case goes to court, so schools are limited to take actions that are as a result of students’ posts on social media (Lenartz, 2012). The schools may take the initiative to investigate the student’s character in school and then decide on their fate after they gather enough evidence. Such action will promote harmony in the school since they will be able to discern the possible loopholes the students are using to break the law and then use it to punish them. 

Most schools limit students’ speech on campus, banning languages that are vulgar, racist, hateful, bullying, or otherwise disruptive to the class. Students will only be prompted for a disciplinary if they go against these set rules only within the school’sschool’s compound. Nevertheless, just by posting on social media concerning the said limitations should not be a reason as to why the administration suspended the victims (Lenartz, 2012). Some institutions monitor their student’s actions within their premises to ensure they adhere to the set rules and ensure that they do not be a nuisance to other students in school, which is a good thing to do. If students break the rules here, they will be liable for disciplinary actions. 

In conclusion, students should not be punished for their social media posts since most may not have substantive evidence. Universities and colleges should discern students’ characters within the school. If they find their characters threaten their fellow students’ rights, they then impose disciplinary actions on them; instead, they should not follow what the students say on social media platforms. 







Tabor, J. (2009). Students’ first amendment rights in the age of the Internet: Off-campus cyber speech and school regulation. BCL Rev.50, 561.

Lenartz, A. J. (2012). Establishing guidelines for the use of social media in higher education. In Misbehavior online in higher education. Emerald Group Publishing Limited.

O’Fallon, M. J., & Butterfield, K. D. (2013). A review of the empirical ethical decision-making literature: 1996–2003. Citation classics from the journal of business ethics, 213-263.


How to place an order?

Take a few steps to place an order on our site:

  • Fill out the form and state the deadline.
  • Calculate the price of your order and pay for it with your credit card.
  • When the order is placed, we select a suitable writer to complete it based on your requirements.
  • Stay in contact with the writer and discuss vital details of research.
  • Download a preview of the research paper. Satisfied with the outcome? Press “Approve.”

Feel secure when using our service

It's important for every customer to feel safe. Thus, at University Study, we take care of your security.

Financial security You can safely pay for your order using secure payment systems.
Personal security Any personal information about our customers is private. No other person can get access to it.
Academic security To deliver no-plagiarism samples, we use a specially-designed software to check every finished paper.
Web security This website is protected from illegal breaks. We constantly update our privacy management.

Get assistance with placing your order. Clarify any questions about our services. Contact our support team. They are available 24\7.

Still thinking about where to hire experienced authors and how to boost your grades? Place your order on our website and get help with any paper you need. We’ll meet your expectations.

Order now Get a quote

error: Content is protected !!
Open chat
Need assignment help? You can contact our live agent via WhatsApp using +1 718 717 2861

Feel free to ask questions, clarifications, or discounts available when placing an order.

Order your essay today and save 30% with the discount code STUDY